1. Do McGlynne et al. agree with the courts’ assessment of revenge porn cases as breaches of privacy? Whatever your answer, how do they more deeply qualify (describe) these crimes? _x000D_
_x000D_
2. What kinds of response (social? legal? political?) to these kinds of crimes do they suggest and why? Is there any consistency between their suggestions and the relational approach to understanding harm, law?_x000D_
_x000D_
3. The decision in the Jane Doe case takes into account the ‘harm’ that the crime caused. Is the judge’s decision reflective of the relational approach to ‘harm’, or not so much?_x000D_
_x000D_
The additional materials MUST be read and used to answer these questions correctly. Thank you. Only 4 sentences each maximum. The answers need to be short and to the point.